By Robert St. Martin
Los Angeles, CA (The Hollywood Times) 12/13/24 – Wednesday evening at the Los Feliz Theatre in Los Angeles was a screening of the restored print of Sergei Parajanov’s The Color of Pomegranates (Sayat Nova, Soviet Union, 1968). Parajanov was an Armenian-born major filmmaker in the former Soviet Union, who made his films in the Ukraine and also in his homeland of then-Soviet Armenia. Sayat Nova is a kaleidoscopic biography of 18th-century Armenian troubadour Sayat Nova (born as Harutyun Sayatyan), who was a poet and wandering troubadour in Armenia and Georgia but later became an Armenian monk and eventually an archbishop before his death at the hands of the Persians in a war.

According to film historian Frank Williams, Parajanov’s film celebrates the survival of Armenian culture in face of oppression and persecution: “There are specific images that are highly charged – blood-red juice spilling from a cut pomegranate into a cloth and forming a stain in the shape of the boundaries of the ancient Kingdom of Armenia; dyers lifting hanks of wool out of vats in the colors of the national flag, and so on.”

Parajanov said his inspiration was “the Armenian illuminated miniature,” and that he “wanted to create that inner dynamic that comes from inside the picture, the forms and the dramaturgy of colour.” He has also described this film as a series of Persian miniatures. This dazzling epic film is as far from a traditional biopic as one can imagine. Parajanov, writing in the 1970s about “The Color of Pomegranates,” wrote that it was inspired by the concept of miniatures in art, especially Persian ones.

The film employs remarkable, dreamlike imagery to capture the essence of Sayat Nova’s work rather than portray a strict chronology of his life. Parajanov’s film has been much esteemed by other directors – including Michelangelo Antonioni, who stated “Color of Pomegranates is of a stunningly perfect beauty. Parajanov, in my opinion, is one of best film directors in the world.” Soviet authorities, however, were less sympathetic, suppressing the film and ultimately jailing its director.






